Getting started with the collection:
Begrafenis in de Campagna
Johan Daniël Koelman, 1841 - 1857
- Artwork typedrawing
- Object numberRP-T-1959-67
- Dimensionsheight 340 mm x width 495 mm
- Physical characteristicspotlood, pen en penseel in bruin, penseel in oranje
Identification
Title(s)
Begrafenis in de Campagna
Object type
Object number
RP-T-1959-67
Creation
Creation
draftsman (artist): Johan Daniël Koelman
Dating
1841 - 1857
Search further with
Material and technique
Physical description
potlood, pen en penseel in bruin, penseel in oranje
Dimensions
height 340 mm x width 495 mm
This work is about
Subject
Acquisition and rights
Acquisition
purchase 1959
Copyright
Provenance
…; collection Johan Gualtherus van der Poort (1713-86) and Johanna Susanna van der Mandere (1714-93), Oostkapelle;{De Vries 2010, p. 153.} their grandson and heir, Johan Steengracht van Oostcapelle (1782-1846), Den Haag; his son, Nicolaas Johan Steengracht (1806-66), Kasteel Duivenvoorde, Voorschoten; his son, Hendricus Adolphus Steengracht (1836-1912), Kasteel Duivenvoorde, Voorschoten; his sister’s grandson, W.A.A.J. Schimmelpenninck van der Oye (1834-1889), Kasteel Duivenvoorde, Voorschoten; his sister, Ludolphine Henriette Schimmelpenninck van der Oye (1891-1965), Kasteel Duivenvoorde, Voorschoten; sale, Dr. Max Jacob Friedländer (1867-1958, Amsterdam) et al. [section Steengracht-Schimmelpenninck van der Oye van Duivenvoorde] , Amsterdam (P. Brandt) , 17 March 1959, no. 181, fl. 70, with seven other drawings, to the museum
Remarks
Please note that this provenance was formulated with a special focus on provenance research for the years 1933-45 and could therefore be incomplete. There may be more (mostly earlier) provenance information known in the museum. In case this item has an uncertain or incomplete provenance for the years 1933-45, the Rijksmuseum welcomes information and assistance in the investigation and clarification of the provenance of all works during that era.
Persistent URL
To refer to this object, please use the following persistent URL:
Questions?
Do you spot a mistake? Or do you have information about the object? Let us know!