Getting started with the collection:
Wooded Coastal Landscape
Roelant Roghman, c. 1650 - c. 1657
- Artwork typedrawing
- Object numberRP-T-1989-92
- Dimensionsheight 181 mm x width 162 mm
- Physical characteristicsblack chalk, with point of brush and grey ink and grey wash; framing line in brown ink
Identification
Title(s)
Wooded Coastal Landscape
Object type
Object number
RP-T-1989-92
Part of catalogue
Creation
Creation
draftsman (artist): Roelant Roghman
Dating
c. 1650 - c. 1657
Search further with
Material and technique
Physical description
black chalk, with point of brush and grey ink and grey wash; framing line in brown ink
Dimensions
height 181 mm x width 162 mm
This work is about
Subject
Acquisition and rights
Credit line
Purchased with the support of the Vereniging Rembrandt, with additional funding from the Prins Bernhard Fonds, the Rijksmuseum-Stichting and De Ster Holding BV
Acquisition
purchase 1989
Copyright
Provenance
…; anonymous sale, Leipzig;{According to Vosmaer’s list of drawings, a ‘_landsch.O.I.i[nkt]_’ by Roghman was bought at an unspecified sale in Leipzig; cf. Amsterdam 1989, p. 57.} collection Carel Vosmaer (1826-88), The Hague; his son, Prof. Dr Gualtherus Carel Jacob Vosmaer (1854-1916), Leiden;{Note RMA.} his son, Carel Johannes Jacob Gualtherus Vosmaer (1907-86), Leiden;{Note RMA.} from whose heirs, with 212 other drawings, fl. 650,000, to the museum (L. 2228), with the support of the Vereniging Rembrandt, the Rijksmuseum Stichting and De Ster Holding BV, 1989
Remarks
Please note that this provenance was formulated with a special focus on provenance research for the years 1933-45 and could therefore be incomplete. There may be more (mostly earlier) provenance information known in the museum. In case this item has an uncertain or incomplete provenance for the years 1933-45, the Rijksmuseum welcomes information and assistance in the investigation and clarification of the provenance of all works during that era.
Documentation
Persistent URL
To refer to this object, please use the following persistent URL:
Questions?
Do you spot a mistake? Or do you have information about the object? Let us know!